Rocket League — Beta

See why your pressure is not becoming goals.

Submit your Rocket League replay and receive a human-reviewed, timestamped team report covering rotations, spacing, boost usage, challenge order, recoveries, physical play, shot creation, defensive structure, and the three changes that matter most next match.

Apply for the Beta View Rocket League Sample

Replay statistics show what happened. RunbackIQ connects those numbers to the decisions, rotations, and team structures that caused the result.

No card required to submitWe check your footage before paymentIf we cannot review it, you pay nothingPrivate by defaultOne clarification revision included

Beta status: Rocket League reviews are accepted by application or review request, not automatic checkout, until a tested workflow and a qualified reviewer are confirmed.

A clear explanation of why you lost

The exact moments that support every conclusion

Player responsibility without careless blame

Three shared corrections the team can use immediately

Sample preview

NRG won the stat sheet and lost 4–1

NRG held 57.44% possession, won the demo count 6–2, collected more boost, and moved farther — yet lost 4–1. RunbackIQ explains why those apparent advantages did not create valuable chances.

Public Broadcast Sample

This report evaluates visible tactics, execution, adaptations and opponent tendencies from an official broadcast. Private communications, every hidden player perspective and intended internal calls were unavailable. Conclusions are limited to the evidence shown.

Game in 60 Seconds

Vitality vs NRG — Game 1

Vitality 4 — NRG 1 · Communication: Not Assessed (no team comms submitted)

NRG controlled the ball and won almost every surface-level statistic, but their possession was built in low-value areas: wide, on the walls, and in front of a defense that was already set. Vitality conceded territory, kept two players relevant behind the ball, and converted three of their four goals from central chances created within two touches of a won challenge. The demo advantage did not translate because most demos happened away from the play or after the shot window had closed.

Three main priorities

1.Convert wide possession into central chances within two touchesWide possession is only useful if it becomes a central entry. Set a two-touch rule: pass in, cut in, or reset — no third wall touch.
2.Fix challenge order on the first defensive contactThe first player back challenges decisively or fully retreats. Half-challenges gave up the middle repeatedly and forced the second player into a losing 1v2.
3.Rebuild the third player's boost path and backboard positionThe last player collects small pads on the way back and holds a position where a backboard read is possible, rather than chasing a big pad away from goal.

Player accountability example

Player 1 — first man / aggressor
Positive: Won the majority of midfield 50/50s and generated the game's best central chance.
Correctable: Three half-challenges in the first half of the game surrendered the middle of the field.
Next action: Decide before contact: challenge or retreat. Track the count out loud next match.

Boost and positioning comparison

Metric	NRG	Vitality
Possession share	57.44%	42.56%
Demos	6	2
Boost collected	Higher	Lower
Time at zero boost (last man)	Higher	Lower

PriorityChallenge Order

02:14Evidence: Confirmed

Situation: Vitality carry into midfield with NRG's first player arriving on time
What happened: The first player shadowed rather than challenged, then challenged late once the carry had already turned inside.
Why it mattered: The delay turned a 1v1 at midfield into a central 2v1 and led directly to the second goal against.
Responsibility: First player back

Next-game rule

First contact is a decision: commit to the challenge or fully retreat behind the ball. No shadow-then-challenge.

Repeated IssueBoost Economy

03:47Evidence: Confirmed

Situation: Defensive third reset after a cleared ball
What happened: The last player crossed midfield for a corner big pad instead of taking the pad line back toward goal, arriving at 12 boost.
Why it mattered: Time spent at low boost near goal removed the backboard read on two of the four goals conceded.
Responsibility: Third player

Next-game rule

The last player back only takes pads on the direct path home, and never crosses midfield to refuel.

Open the complete sample report

This sample is an independent educational analysis of publicly broadcast footage. RunbackIQ is not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by Vitality, NRG, RLCS, BLAST, Psyonix or Epic Games. No team, league or publisher logos are used.

Who it's for

Built for organized Rocket League teams

This is not a professional-players-only service, and no report guarantees a rank increase, a tournament win or any other specific result.

Competitive 2v2 and 3v3 teams
Ranked teams and regular three-player stacks
Amateur league and tournament teams
Champion, Grand Champion and Supersonic Legend players
Collegiate and school esports programs
Small organizations without a dedicated coach or analyst

What we analyze

Rocket League team analysis, area by area

Every area below is tied to specific replay moments, never asserted from a statistic alone.

Rotation & structure

First-, second- and third-player responsibilities
Offensive rotations and spacing
Defensive rotations and backboard coverage
Transition defense and protection behind the ball
Kickoffs and post-goal stabilization

Offense & chance quality

Possession quality instead of possession percentage alone
Central chance creation and rebound support
Shot selection and finishing conditions
Demos and bumps connected to usable scoring opportunities

Defense & challenges

Challenge order and defensive timing
Recoveries, unnecessary movement and overcommits
Opponent tendencies

Boost & mechanics economy

Boost collection, boost retention and small-pad pathing
Time spent at zero boost
Individual role accountability
Measurable next-match priorities
Recurring patterns across multiple reviews

Report presentation

A layered report, not a wall of text

You read the first two layers in a minute. The detail is there when you want it.

01
Game in 60 Seconds
The result, the main explanation, and the three biggest takeaways.
02
Three Main Priorities
Only the most important team-wide corrections — never a list of twelve things to fix.
03
Timestamped Evidence
The most valuable replay moments, linked directly to the footage.
04
Goal-by-Goal Audit
What created every goal for and against, in order.
05
Player Accountability
Positive contributions, correctable responsibility and role-specific next actions.
06
Supporting Analysis
Rotations, boost economy, movement, demos, offense, defense and opponent tendencies.
07
Next-Match Targets
Measurable process goals the team fully controls.
08
Detailed Appendix
Extended statistics and maximum-detail analysis for teams that want all of it.

Confirmed

Directly supported by the replay, broadcast, score or replay telemetry.

Likely

A strong tactical inference supported by multiple data points.

Needs Team Context

Depends on the team's intended role, rotation, kickoff or communication rule.

Communication: Not Assessed is displayed whenever audible team comms are not submitted. A communication grade is never invented from gameplay alone.

Rocket League packages

The same prices as every other supported title

Team analysis is the flagship service, and an Individual POV Review is available for a single player. Only the size of one review unit changes between games.

What one review covers for this game

Up to three matches or 25 active minutes

Active minutes means actual gameplay being reviewed. Queues, warm-ups, intermissions, menus and unrelated stream content do not count toward the limit.

If your footage clearly exceeds the limit, add extra active minutes at checkout or ask for a manual quote — we will point you to the correct package before any payment is taken.

Quick Team Audit

Best for: A team that wants a fast, honest read on the moments that decided the result.

$25

per submission

Three pivotal rounds, possessions, matches or game segments
5–7 important timestamps
Short team scorecard
What worked
Most important breakdowns
Exactly three next-game priorities

This is not a complete game or every-round review. For full coverage choose the Full Team Review, or the Competitive Team Deep Dive for every round or possession.

Choose Quick Team Audit

Checkout opens only for titles with a qualified reviewer and available capacity. Payment instructions are emailed after your footage is confirmed.

Full Team Review

Competitive Team Deep Dive

Best for: Playoff or league preparation where every round or possession matters.

$89$129

one complete review unit, nothing skipped

Founding price — editable at any time

Every round, possession or meaningful game segment reviewed
Detailed chronological breakdown
Complete team-systems and role analysis
Economy, resources, boost, utility, objectives, transitions or possession tracking where relevant
Communication analysis when comms are provided
Patterns across every player or role
Opponent adjustments and tendencies
Evidence-based accountability
Exactly three headline priorities
Measurable next-game targets
Approximately 5,000–7,000 words when the footage contains enough meaningful evidence

If you want every round or possession covered, this is the package that does it.

Choose Competitive Team Deep Dive

Checkout opens only for titles with a qualified reviewer and available capacity. Payment instructions are emailed after your footage is confirmed.

Optional services

Add these to any package at checkout.

Additional 15 active minutes+$10 individual / +$15 team

For footage past your review-unit limit, per additional 15 active minutes.

Additional player POV+$15

A second player POV, subject to footage quality and scope approval.

24-hour rush delivery+50% of the package

Your report within 24 hours of confirmed payment, subject to availability.

Communication analysis is included in Full Team Reviews and Deep Dives whenever usable comms are supplied — it is never charged separately.

Compare Rocket League Packages

Team package comparison for RunbackIQ VOD reviews
Feature	Quick Team Audit	Full Team ReviewMost Popular	Competitive Team Deep Dive
Best for	Fast read on pivotal moments	Standard complete team review	Every round or possession
Price	$25	$59	$129
Founding price	$25	$40	$89
Price per game	$25	$59	$129
Split five ways	$5.00	$11.80	$25.80
Coverage	3 pivotal segments	One complete review unit	Every round, possession or segment
Important timestamps	5–7	12–20	Every notable moment
Team scorecard	Short	Full	Full
Communication analysis	No	When comms are provided	When comms are provided
Opponent tendencies	No	Yes	Yes, with adjustments
Role-based accountability	Brief notes	Yes	Every player or role
Headline priorities	Exactly 3	Exactly 3	Exactly 3
Measurable next-game targets	Yes	Yes	Yes
Delivery time	3 business days	2–3 business days	Confirmed per submission

Rocket League is labelled Beta: orders are limited and reviewed for eligibility before any payment is arranged.

Rocket League Founding Team Beta

Three free Full Match Runback reviews

RunbackIQ is selecting three competitive Rocket League teams to receive a free Full Match Runback in exchange for honest feedback. If the report helps your team, you may optionally provide a testimonial and allow an anonymous excerpt to be used as a sample.

One application per team
Accessible replay files or Ballchasing links
A complete match series or three ranked games
Accurate gamer tags and team information
Honest post-report feedback

A positive testimonial is never required. Applications are read as they arrive and no spot is claimed as filled while it is still open.

Apply for the Beta

Introductory offer

First Full Match Runback — $25

After the three free beta reviews are completed, the next five teams receive their first Full Match Runback for $25. Teams after that move to the normal $40 founding price.

Credibility

Human-reviewed. Data-assisted. Evidence-labeled.

RunbackIQ uses replay footage and replay telemetry to support human tactical analysis. A report is never generated from statistics alone: telemetry is used to test or disprove a conclusion a person reached while watching the replay.

Assigned reviewer

A qualified Rocket League reviewer has not yet been assigned. Rocket League therefore stays marked Beta and accepts applications and review requests rather than automatic purchases. The reviewer's rank, competitive or coaching experience, modes reviewed, methodology and any verified credentials will be published here before paid Rocket League reviews open.

Rocket League rank: To be published when assigned
Competitive or coaching experience: To be published when assigned
Games and modes reviewed: 2v2 and 3v3 competitive and tournament play
Review methodology: Replay watched in full at match speed, then re-examined per goal and per rotation cycle. Replay telemetry (Ballchasing) is used to test tactical conclusions, never to generate them. Every finding receives an evidence-confidence label before delivery.
Verified credentials: None claimed

Trust points

Customer replays remain private unless permission is granted.
Reports distinguish facts from tactical inference.
RunbackIQ does not manufacture player blame.
Communication is never graded when comms are unavailable.
Improvement and winning are not guaranteed.
Every paid report is reviewed before delivery.

Replay files (.replay) and Ballchasing links are preferred because they provide stronger positioning, boost, movement and player-perspective evidence. Broadcast or video-only links are still accepted, but a video-only review may not reveal every off-ball movement.

Recurring value

One review finds the problem. Several show if it's still there.

One review identifies your current problems. Multiple reviews show whether the same mistakes are continuing. Reports are delivered by email — there is no dashboard to log into, and one will only be built if recurring demand proves it useful.

Recurring-problem tracker
Priority status: New, Repeated, Improving or Resolved
Player-role trends
Boost-efficiency comparison
Rotation and positioning comparison
Progress scorecard
Previous and current timestamp evidence
Updated team priorities after each match

What footage does my report require?

Every RunbackIQ report is human-reviewed and data-assisted, so the depth of a report is limited by the evidence you can supply. Statistics can confirm a result; only gameplay footage can show positioning, spacing, rotations, decision timing, communication or responsibility.

Match ID or statistics only
Not eligible for a VOD review
These sources can confirm the result and provide statistical context, but they cannot show positioning, spacing, rotations, decision timing, communication, intended strategy or player responsibility. A gameplay review cannot be purchased using only these sources.
- ·Match IDs
- ·Tracker links
- ·Box-score screenshots
- ·Statistics pages
- ·Match-history summaries
One complete player POV
Individual POV Review eligible
A complete player POV can evaluate that player’s visible decisions, mechanics, positioning, resources and role execution. It cannot confidently diagnose the complete team system or assign responsibility to unseen teammates.
Full observer VOD or navigable replay
Full Team Review eligible
A complete observer feed, wide team VOD or navigable replay can support team-wide tactical analysis. If communications are not included, communication is marked Not Assessed.
Replay or observer source plus comms and team context
Competitive Team Deep Dive eligible
A Deep Dive requires the strongest available evidence. A full-length video does not automatically qualify if the camera cannot show the necessary information.
- ·Complete navigable replay or observer/team VOD
- ·Team communications when communication is being evaluated
- ·Complete roster and role information
- ·Intended team system or rules
- ·Supporting player POVs when available
- ·Final statistics or match data

Universal video requirements

Complete and uncut
1080p and 60 FPS preferred
At least 720p if the HUD remains readable
Clear enough to read names, score, clock, resources, utility and boost
Free from overlays covering important information
Accessible without passwords or private credentials
Available until the report is delivered
Accompanied by exact start and end timestamps when multiple games appear in one VOD

Unlisted YouTube, a downloadable Google Drive file, a direct upload or another stable source is recommended. Twitch VODs may be accepted, but require exact timestamps — expired or inaccessible links can delay the report.

Not accepted

Highlight reels
Edited montages
Incomplete games
Footage missing rounds or possessions
Unreadable video
Cropped footage hiding the HUD
Links requiring customer account credentials

RunbackIQ will never request your game-account password, verification code or login credentials.

If the evidence does not match the package, payment is not taken automatically. We will ask you to submit better footage, select the correct package, or request manual approval. Permission to privately review footage does not grant permission to publish it. Public use of your footage or report always requires separate permission.

Rocket League footage requirements

Preferred for a Full Team Review

Native .replay file, or an exact private or unlisted Ballchasing replay link
One file or link for every match in a series
Reviewed team and color
All player gamer tags
2v2 or 3v3
Rank or competition level
Final score and overtime result
Game number within the series
Platform

Recommended for a Deep Dive

Native replay or replay-service link
Separate synchronized VOD with team communications
Kickoff assignments
Team terminology
Expected first-, second- and third-man rules
Your main review questions
Supporting player POVs when needed

How to capture it

PC: Save the match through Profile and Match History. On PC, replay files are normally located in Documents > My Games > Rocket League > TAGame > Demos.
Console: If you cannot export the raw replay file, record the complete replay using Director or Fly view and the relevant player perspectives, or ask a PC participant from the match to upload the replay.

A Rocket League MatchGuid or match number alone does not retrieve playable gameplay. A Ballchasing replay ID or exact link is different, because it points to an uploaded replay.

A replay without comms can still qualify for a Full Team Review, but Communication must be marked Not Assessed. A single POV normally qualifies only for an Individual POV Review.

What a Rocket League report can evaluate

Kickoffs
First-, second- and third-man structure
Rotations
Spacing
Double commits
Challenge timing
Pressure
Passing lanes
Possession decisions
Boost management
Recoveries
Shadow defense
Backboard coverage
Demos
Transition defense
Goal causality
Role execution
Opponent tendencies

Evidence labels

Every report is human-reviewed and data-assisted. Conclusions carry the label that matches the evidence supplied.

Confirmed: Directly visible or statistically verified.
Likely: Strongly supported but not completely visible.
Needs Team Context: Requires information about the team’s system, role or call.
Not Assessed: The required evidence was not supplied.

·A positioning mistake is never labelled a communication problem when communications were not submitted.
·Intended calls, strategy, caller responsibility and player blame are never invented.
·Exactly three headline priorities in every report.
·Measurable next-game targets in every report.
·No training-drill section.

The journey

From replay to next match

1Visit the Rocket League page
2Understand the difference between statistics and analysis
3View the sample
4Choose a package or apply for the Beta
5Submit replay data
6Footage is verified
7Pay when applicable
8Receive the report
9Submit another match to track improvement

Rocket League FAQ

Questions teams ask first

Why is Rocket League marked Beta?

Because the Rocket League workflow is still being tested and a qualified reviewer has not been assigned yet. During Beta, RunbackIQ accepts applications and review requests rather than automatic checkout.

Do you prefer replay files or video?

Replay files or Ballchasing links, because they show off-ball positioning, boost and movement that a broadcast camera hides. Video-only submissions are accepted with that limitation stated in the report.

Is this 2v2 or 3v3?

Both. Role responsibilities are written for the format you submit, so a 2v2 report never grades you against a three-player rotation.

How is possession handled?

Possession percentage on its own is not treated as an advantage. Reports evaluate where possession happened and whether it produced central entries and usable chances.

Will communication be graded?

Only when audible team comms are submitted. Otherwise the report shows “Communication: Not Assessed” — a grade is never inferred from gameplay.

Will a report raise our rank?

No report can promise a rank increase, a tournament win or any specific result. What you receive is evidence, responsibility and three corrections you control.

Ready to see what the replay proves?